On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:25 PM, David Turner <drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you can move away from having a non-default cluster name, do that. It's honestly worth the hassle if it's early enough in your deployment. Otherwise you'll end up needing to symlink a lot of things to the default ceph name. Back when it was supported, we still needed to have /etc/ceph/ceph.conf symlinked to our actual config file for multiple ceph tools. It was never a widely adopted feature, and the nature open-source had a lot of people contributing tools that had never used or thought about clusters with different names.On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:56 PM Robert Stanford <rstanford8896@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Thanks Gregory. How much trouble I'd have saved if I'd only known this...______________________________On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Not sure about this specific issue, but I believe we've deprecated the use of cluster names due to (very) low usage and trouble reliably testing for all the little things like this. :/-GregOn Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:18 AM Robert Stanford <rstanford8896@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:______________________________Is this a known issue, or am I missing something?If I use another cluster name (other than the default "ceph"), I've learned that I have to create symlinks in /var/lib/ceph/osd/ with [cluster-name]-[osd-num] that symlink to ceph-[osd-num]. The ceph-disk command doesn't seem to take a --cluster argument like other commands._________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph. com
_________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph. com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
