On 03/28/2018 11:11 AM, Mark Nelson wrote: > Personally I usually use a modified version of Mark Seger's getput > tool here: > > https://github.com/markhpc/getput/tree/wip-fix-timing > > The difference between this version and upstream is primarily to make > getput more accurate/useful when using something like CBT for > orchestration instead of the included orchestration wrapper (gpsuite). > > CBT can use this version of getput and run relatively accurate > mutli-client tests without requiring quite as much setup as cosbench. > Having said that, many folks have used cosbench effectively and I > suspect that might be a good option for many people. I'm not sure how > much development is happening these days, I think the primary author > may no longer be working on the project. > AFAIK the project is still alive. Adding Mark. Mohamad > Mark > > On 03/28/2018 09:21 AM, David Byte wrote: >> I use cosbench (the last rc works well enough). I can get multiple >> GB/s from my 6 node cluster with 2 RGWs. >> >> David Byte >> Sr. Technical Strategist >> IHV Alliances and Embedded >> SUSE >> >> Sent from my iPhone. Typos are Apple's fault. >> >> On Mar 28, 2018, at 5:26 AM, Janne Johansson <icepic.dz@xxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:icepic.dz@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >>> s3cmd and cli version of cyberduck to test it end-to-end using >>> parallelism if possible. >>> >>> Getting some 100MB/s at most, from 500km distance over https against >>> 5*radosgw behind HAProxy. >>> >>> >>> 2018-03-28 11:17 GMT+02:00 Matthew Vernon <mv3@xxxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:mv3@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What are people here using to benchmark their S3 service (i.e. >>> the rgw)? >>> rados bench is great for some things, but doesn't tell me about >>> what >>> performance I can get from my rgws. >>> >>> It seems that there used to be rest-bench, but that isn't in Jewel >>> AFAICT; I had a bit of a look at cosbench but it looks fiddly to >>> set up >>> and a bit under-maintained (the most recent version doesn't work >>> out of >>> the box, and the PR to fix that has been languishing for a while). >>> >>> This doesn't seem like an unusual thing to want to do, so I'd >>> like to >>> know what other ceph folk are using (and, if you like, the >>> numbers you >>> get from the benchmarkers)...? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Matthew >>> >>> >>> -- >>> The Wellcome Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research >>> Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a >>> company registered in England with number 2742969, whose >>> registered >>> office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> May the most significant bit of your life be positive. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |