Re: What do you use to benchmark your rgw?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Personally I usually use a modified version of Mark Seger's getput tool here:

https://github.com/markhpc/getput/tree/wip-fix-timing

The difference between this version and upstream is primarily to make getput more accurate/useful when using something like CBT for orchestration instead of the included orchestration wrapper (gpsuite).

CBT can use this version of getput and run relatively accurate mutli-client tests without requiring quite as much setup as cosbench.  Having said that, many folks have used cosbench effectively and I suspect that might be a good option for many people.  I'm not sure how much development is happening these days, I think the primary author may no longer be working on the project.

Mark

On 03/28/2018 09:21 AM, David Byte wrote:
I use cosbench (the last rc works well enough). I can get multiple GB/s from my 6 node cluster with 2 RGWs.

David Byte
Sr. Technical Strategist
IHV Alliances and Embedded
SUSE

Sent from my iPhone. Typos are Apple's fault.

On Mar 28, 2018, at 5:26 AM, Janne Johansson <icepic.dz@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:icepic.dz@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

s3cmd and cli version of cyberduck to test it end-to-end using parallelism if possible.

Getting some 100MB/s at most, from 500km distance over https against 5*radosgw behind HAProxy.


2018-03-28 11:17 GMT+02:00 Matthew Vernon <mv3@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mv3@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>:

    Hi,

    What are people here using to benchmark their S3 service (i.e.
    the rgw)?
    rados bench is great for some things, but doesn't tell me about what
    performance I can get from my rgws.

    It seems that there used to be rest-bench, but that isn't in Jewel
    AFAICT; I had a bit of a look at cosbench but it looks fiddly to
    set up
    and a bit under-maintained (the most recent version doesn't work
    out of
    the box, and the PR to fix that has been languishing for a while).

    This doesn't seem like an unusual thing to want to do, so I'd like to
    know what other ceph folk are using (and, if you like, the
    numbers you
    get from the benchmarkers)...?

    Thanks,

    Matthew


    --
     The Wellcome Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research
     Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a
     company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered
     office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
    _______________________________________________
    ceph-users mailing list
    ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
    <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>




--
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux