Re: OSD maintenance (ceph osd set noout)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:37 PM, Andre Goree <andre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is it still considered best practice to set 'noout' for OSDs that will be
> going under maintenance, e.g., rebooting an OSD ndoe for a kernel update?
>
> I ask, because I've set this twice now during times which the OSDs would
> only momentarily be 'out', however each time I've done this, the OSDs have
> become unusable and I've had to rebuild them.

Can you be more specific about "unusable"?  Marking an OSD noout is of
course not meant to harm it!

John

> Also, when I _do not_ set 'noout', it would seem that once the node reboots
> the OSDs come back online without issue _and_ there is very _little_
> recovery i/o -- I'd expect to see lots of recovery i/o if a node goes down
> as the cluster tries to replace the PGs on other OSD nodes.  This further
> makes me believe that setting 'noout' is no longer necessary.
>
> I'm running version 12.2.2-12.2.4 (in the middle of upgrading).
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Andre Goree
> -=-=-=-=-=-
> Email     - andre at drenet.net
> Website   - http://blog.drenet.net
> PGP key   - http://www.drenet.net/pubkey.html
> -=-=-=-=-=-
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux