Hi Wes,
On 15-1-2018 20:32, Wes Dillingham wrote:
I dont hear a lot of people discuss using xfs_fsr on OSDs and going over
the mailing list history it seems to have been brought up very
infrequently and never as a suggestion for regular maintenance. Perhaps
its not needed.
True, it's just something we've always done on all our xfs filesystems,
to keep them speedy and snappy. I've disabled it, and then it doesn't
happen.
Perhaps I'll keep it disabled.
But on this last question, about data distribution across OSDs:
In that case, how about reweighting that osd.10 to "0", wait until
all data has moved off osd.10, and then setting it back to "1".
Would this result in *exactly* the same situation as before, or
would it at least cause the data to have spread move better across
the other OSDs?
Would it work like that? Or would setting it back to "1" give me again
the same data on this OSD that we started with?
Thanks for your comments,
MJ
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
