Re: Performance issues on Luminous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



you never said if it was bluestore or filestore?

Can you look in the server to see which component is being stressed
(network, cpu, disk)? Utilities like atop are very handy for this.

Regarding those specific SSDs they are particularly bad when running
some time without trimming - performance nosedives by at least an
order of magnitude. If you really want to go with that risk look at
least to the PROs. And some workloads will always be slow on them.

You never say what's your target environment: do you value
IOPS/latency? Those CPUs won't be great, and I've read a few things
recommending to avoid NUMA (2 CPUs in there). And (higher) frequency
is more important than # of cores to have a high IOPS cluster.

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Rafał Wądołowski
<rwadolowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have size of 2.
>
> We know about this risk and we accept it, but we still don't know why
> performance so so bad.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rafał Wądołowski
>
> On 04.01.2018 16:51, ceph@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> I assume you have size of 3 then divide your expected 400 with 3 and you are
> not far Away from what you get...
>
> In Addition you should Never use Consumer grade ssds for ceph as they will
> be reach the DWPD very soon...
>
> Am 4. Januar 2018 09:54:55 MEZ schrieb "Rafał Wądołowski"
> <rwadolowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I am currently benchmarking my cluster for an performance issue and I
>> have no idea, what is going on. I am using these devices in qemu.
>>
>> Ceph version 12.2.2
>>
>> Infrastructure:
>>
>> 3 x Ceph-mon
>>
>> 11 x Ceph-osd
>>
>> Ceph-osd has 22x1TB Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
>>
>> 96GB RAM
>>
>> 2x E5-2650 v4
>>
>> 4x10G Network (2 seperate bounds for cluster and public) with MTU 9000
>>
>>
>> I had tested it with rados bench:
>>
>> # rados bench -p rbdbench 30 write -t 1
>>
>> Total time run:         30.055677
>> Total writes made:      1199
>> Write size:             4194304
>> Object size:            4194304
>> Bandwidth (MB/sec):     159.571
>> Stddev Bandwidth:       6.83601
>> Max bandwidth (MB/sec): 168
>> Min bandwidth (MB/sec): 140
>> Average IOPS:           39
>> Stddev IOPS:            1
>> Max IOPS:               42
>> Min IOPS:               35
>> Average Latency(s):     0.0250656
>> Stddev Latency(s):      0.00321545
>> Max latency(s):         0.0471699
>> Min latency(s):         0.0206325
>>
>> # ceph tell osd.0 bench
>> {
>>      "bytes_written": 1073741824,
>>      "blocksize": 4194304,
>>      "bytes_per_sec": 414199397
>> }
>>
>> Testing osd directly
>>
>> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc bs=4M oflag=direct count=100
>> 100+0 records in
>> 100+0 records out
>> 419430400 bytes (419 MB, 400 MiB) copied, 1.0066 s, 417 MB/s
>>
>> When I do dd inside vm (bs=4M wih direct), I have result like in rados
>> bench.
>>
>> I think that the speed should be arround ~400MB/s.
>>
>> Is there any new parameters for rbd in luminous? Maybe I forgot about
>> some performance tricks? If more information needed feel free to ask.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux