question pool usage vs. pool usage raw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



this question has probably come up before but I couldn't find any clear answer so far.

What is the difference between the "usage" and the "raw usage" of a pool?

We are using only rbds (no rados no cephfs as for now)
On the first glance the "sum of all rbd sizes" equals the "usage". Right?
(rbs size as give by 'rbd ls -l <poolname> | egrep -v <any_snapshot>')
Even though the rbds are far from beeing filled with data, i.e.


Is the "raw usage" the "usage" + "space needed by all snapshots" (plus some overhead) in the pool?
(which unfortunately is NOT the sum of all 'rbd ls -l <poolname>')

Than the size of the pool would be "raw usage"+"available space"? Right?

In the results of "rados df" or "ceph df" the sum of usage per pool is - at the moment - less than 50% of the global usage. And the global size of the cluster doesn't help me at all, since some pools are smaller, more expensive and much slower filling than others, so I would trigger a notification on a much higher mark than on a huge cheap pool. But I can't find a reliable way to figure out the size of a given pool (other than "usage + availabel", or is it "raw usage + available"?)

TIA

Bernhard


Ecologic Institut gemeinnuetzige GmbH
Pfalzburger Str. 43/44, D-10717 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrerin / Director: Dr. Camilla Bausch
Sitz der Gesellschaft / Registered Office: Berlin (Germany)
Registergericht / Court of Registration: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg), HRB 57947
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux