On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:15 PM, John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Dan van der Ster <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:57 PM, John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Brady Deetz <bdeetz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> My organization has a production cluster primarily used for cephfs upgraded >>>> from jewel to luminous. We would very much like to have snapshots on that >>>> filesystem, but understand that there are risks. >>>> >>>> What kind of work could cephfs admins do to help the devs stabilize this >>>> feature? >>> >>> If you have a disposable test system, then you could install the >>> latest master branch of Ceph (which has a stream of snapshot fixes in >>> it) and run a replica of your intended workload. If you can find >>> snapshot bugs (especially crashes) on master then they will certainly >>> attract interest. >> >> Hi John. Are those fixes in master expected to make snapshots stable >> with rados namespaces (a la Manila) ? > > Was there a specific bug with snapshots+namespaces? I may be having a > failure of memory or have not been paying enough attention :-) > I might be misremembering, but I recall a mail from Greg? a few months ago saying that snapshots would surely not work with multiple namespaces. Can't find the mail, though.... -- dan _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |