On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Dan van der Ster <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:57 PM, John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Brady Deetz <bdeetz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> My organization has a production cluster primarily used for cephfs upgraded >>> from jewel to luminous. We would very much like to have snapshots on that >>> filesystem, but understand that there are risks. >>> >>> What kind of work could cephfs admins do to help the devs stabilize this >>> feature? >> >> If you have a disposable test system, then you could install the >> latest master branch of Ceph (which has a stream of snapshot fixes in >> it) and run a replica of your intended workload. If you can find >> snapshot bugs (especially crashes) on master then they will certainly >> attract interest. > > Hi John. Are those fixes in master expected to make snapshots stable > with rados namespaces (a la Manila) ? Was there a specific bug with snapshots+namespaces? I may be having a failure of memory or have not been paying enough attention :-) John _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |