On Sat, 4 Nov 2017, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Hi Sage, > > Am 26.10.2017 um 13:58 schrieb Sage Weil: > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > >> Hi Sage, > >> > >> Am 25.10.2017 um 21:54 schrieb Sage Weil: > >>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> in the lumious release notes is stated that zstd is not supported by > >>>> bluestor due to performance reason. I'm wondering why btrfs instead > >>>> states that zstd is as fast as lz4 but compresses as good as zlib. > >>>> > >>>> Why is zlib than supported by bluestor? And why does btrfs / facebook > >>>> behave different? > >>>> > >>>> "BlueStore supports inline compression using zlib, snappy, or LZ4. (Ceph > >>>> also supports zstd for RGW compression but zstd is not recommended for > >>>> BlueStore for performance reasons.)" > >>> > >>> zstd will work but in our testing the performance wasn't great for > >>> bluestore in particular. The problem was that for each compression run > >>> there is a relatively high start-up cost initializing the zstd > >>> context/state (IIRC a memset of a huge memory buffer) that dominated the > >>> execution time... primarily because bluestore is generally compressing > >>> pretty small chunks of data at a time, not big buffers or streams. > >>> > >>> Take a look at unittest_compression timings on compressing 16KB buffers > >>> (smaller than bluestore needs usually, but illustrated of the problem): > >>> > >>> [ RUN ] Compressor/CompressorTest.compress_16384/0 > >>> [plugin zlib (zlib/isal)] > >>> [ OK ] Compressor/CompressorTest.compress_16384/0 (294 ms) > >>> [ RUN ] Compressor/CompressorTest.compress_16384/1 > >>> [plugin zlib (zlib/noisal)] > >>> [ OK ] Compressor/CompressorTest.compress_16384/1 (1755 ms) > >>> [ RUN ] Compressor/CompressorTest.compress_16384/2 > >>> [plugin snappy (snappy)] > >>> [ OK ] Compressor/CompressorTest.compress_16384/2 (169 ms) > >>> [ RUN ] Compressor/CompressorTest.compress_16384/3 > >>> [plugin zstd (zstd)] > >>> [ OK ] Compressor/CompressorTest.compress_16384/3 (4528 ms) > >>> > >>> It's an order of magnitude slower than zlib or snappy, which probably > >>> isn't acceptable--even if it is a bit smaller. > > i've fixed the zstd compression plugin to use reset stream instead of > initializing new objects. > > What's needed to run only / just the unittest_compression test? make unittest_compression && bin/unittest_compression should do it! sage _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |