Re: Drive write cache recommendations for Luminous/Bluestore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bluestore shouldn't have changed the disk requirements at all. I presume you are running a kernel newer than 2.6.33 so are probably okay with having the drive cache on, but it will vary with your controller I suspect.
-Greg


On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 3:32 AM Hans van den Bogert <hansbogert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For Bluestore I can't find any documentation or discussions about drive write cache, while I can imagine that revisiting this subject might be necessary.

For our cluster specifically, we use HP gen 9 with a b140i controller where disks are directly attached (i.e., not RAID). Often with the Linux kernel, controllers automatically enable drive write cache for directly attached harddisks since this *should* be safe as long as harddisks correctly adhere to flush semantics . In the case of the b140i controller; I can confirm with `hdparm -W /dev/sdx` that drive write cache is *not* enabled by default.

So my main two questions are:

1. Did anybody do extensive testing, with luminous in combination with drive write cache enabled, or at least elaborate on the subject.
2. Depending on item 1., could and should I enable drive write cache for the disks attached to a HP b140i controller.

Thanks!

Hans
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux