Re: ceph zstd not for bluestor due to performance reasons

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: ceph zstd not for bluestor due to performance reasons
From: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:59:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CACJqLyYsJ8WeWOdu4M2K7bnCbQ=fh8jQ=MP=msa64jo5=fic0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BD0427BB-F720-4746-82F9-E082D2396F56@profihost.ag> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1710251940520.22592@piezo.us.to> <5cf6f721-05ea-4e38-a6b9-04cff5d6aad3@profihost.ag> <CACJqLyYsJ8WeWOdu4M2K7bnCbQ=fh8jQ=MP=msa64jo5=fic0w@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Haomai Wang wrote:
> in our test, lz4 is better than snappy

Let's switch the default then?

sage
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

References:
- ceph zstd not for bluestor due to performance reasons
  - From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
- Re: ceph zstd not for bluestor due to performance reasons
  - From: Sage Weil
- Re: ceph zstd not for bluestor due to performance reasons
  - From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
- Re: ceph zstd not for bluestor due to performance reasons
  - From: Haomai Wang

Prev by Date: Re: ceph zstd not for bluestor due to performance reasons
Next by Date: Re: MDS damaged
Previous by thread: Re: ceph zstd not for bluestor due to performance reasons
Next by thread: Re: ceph zstd not for bluestor due to performance reasons
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux