A new SSD for journals - everything sucks?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello everyone,
lately, we've had issues with buying SSDs that we use for journaling(Kingston stopped making them) - Kingston V300 - so we decided to start using a different model and started researching which one would be the best price/value for us. We compared five models, to check if they are compatible with our needs - SSDNow v300, HyperX Fury,SSDNOw KC400, SSDNow UV400 and SSDNow A400. the best one is still the V300, with the highest iops of 59 001. Second best and still useable was the HyperX Fury with 45000 iops.  The other three had terrible results, the max iops we got were around 13 000 with the dsync and direct flags. We also tested Samsung SSDs(the EVO series) and we got similarly bad results. To get to the root of my question - i am pretty sure we are not the only ones affected by the v300's death. Is there anyone else out there with some benchmarking data/knowledge about some good price/performance SSDs for ceph journaling? I can also share the complete benchmarking data my coworker made, if someone is interested.
Thanks
Josef Zelenka
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux