Re: Snapshot space

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If the clone has written 10GB of data, yes, the clone should show
10GB. I am not sure what you are referring to when you say "clone"
since you only included a single image in your response. The clone is
the image chained from a parent image snapshot. Is
"e01f31e94a65cf7e786972b915e07364-1@d-1" the clone's parent?

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Josy <josy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you for your response!
>
> If the cloned VM had written around 10Gbs of data, wouldn't the clone also
> show that much space?
>
> Below is a list of the original image, the clone and new snapshots along
> with their sizes.
>
> The clone is still only a few hundred megabytes, while the snapshot shows
> "10GB" of disk space.
>
> [cephuser@ceph-las-admin-a1 ceph-cluster]$  rbd du
> cvm/e01f31e94a65cf7e786972b915e07364-1
> warning: fast-diff map is not enabled for
> e01f31e94a65cf7e786972b915e07364-1. operation may be slow.
> NAME                 PROVISIONED   USED
> e01f31e94a65cf7e786972b915e07364-1@d-1       61440M       10840M
> e01f31e94a65cf7e786972b915e07364-1                 61440M 616M
> <TOTAL>                61440M       11456M
>
>
>
> On 09-10-2017 17:22, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>>
>> No -- it means that your clone had written approximately 10GB of space
>> within the image before you created the first snapshot. If the
>> "fast-diff" feature is enabled, note that it only calculates usage in
>> object size chunks (defaults to 4MB) -- which means that even writing
>> 1 byte to a 4MB object would flag the object as dirty (it's an
>> upper-bound estimate).
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Josy <josy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I noticed that when we create a snapshot of a clone, the first snapshot
>>> seems to be quite large.
>>>
>>> For example:
>>>
>>> Clone VM is taking up 136MBs according to rbd du
>>> First snapshot: 10GBs
>>> Second snapshot: 104MBs
>>> Third snapshot: 57MBs
>>>
>>> The clone is a Windows virtual machine, which does take around 10GB if it
>>> wasn't a clone. Does this mean that the first snapshot of a clone needs
>>> to
>>> have a full copy of the original cloned image?
>>>
>>> Ceph version : Luminous 12.2.1
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Jason
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux