Hi David,
Thank you for your support. What can be the cause of active+clean+inconsistent still growing up? Bad disk?
Best regards,
On 19/09/17 17:50, David Turner wrote:
Adding the old OSD back in with its data shouldn't help you at all. Your cluster has finished backfilling and has the proper amount of copies of all of its data. The time you would want to add a removed OSD back to a cluster is when you have unfound objects.
The scrub errors and inconsistent PGs are what you need to focus on and where your current problem is. The message with too many PGs per OSD is just a warning and not causing any issues at this point as long as your OSD nodes aren't having any OOM messages. Once you add in a 6th OSD, that will go away on its own.
There are several threads on the Mailing List that you should be able to find about recovering from these and the potential dangers of some of the commands. Googling for `ceph-users scrub errors inconsistent pgs` is a good place to start.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:28 AM Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado <gaguilar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi David,
What I want is to add the OSD back with its data yes. But avoiding any troubles that can happen from the time it was out.
Is it possible? I suppose that some pg has been updated after. Will ceph manage it gracefully?
Ceph status is getting worse every day.
ceph status
cluster 9028f4da-0d77-462b-be9b-dbdf7fa57771
health HEALTH_ERR
6 pgs inconsistent
31 scrub errors
too many PGs per OSD (305 > max 300)
monmap e12: 2 mons at {blue-compute=172.16.0.119:6789/0,red-compute=172.16.0.100:6789/0}
election epoch 4328, quorum 0,1 red-compute,blue-compute
fsmap e881: 1/1/1 up {0=blue-compute=up:active}
osdmap e7120: 5 osds: 5 up, 5 in
flags require_jewel_osds
pgmap v66976120: 764 pgs, 6 pools, 555 GB data, 140 kobjects
1111 GB used, 3068 GB / 4179 GB avail
758 active+clean
6 active+clean+inconsistent
client io 384 kB/s wr, 0 op/s rd, 83 op/s wr
I want to add the old OSD, rebalance copies are more hosts/osds and remove it out again.
Best regards,
On 19/09/17 14:47, David Turner wrote:
Are you asking to add the osd back with its data or add it back in as a fresh osd. What is your `ceph status`?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, 5:23 AM Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado <gaguilar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for the great explanation of the weights, I thought that ceph was adjusting them based on disk. But it seems it's not.
But the problem was not that I think the node was failing because a software bug because the disk was not full anymeans.
/dev/sdb1 976284608 172396756 803887852 18% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-1
Now the question is to know if I can add again this osd safely. Is it possible?
Best regards,
On 14/09/17 23:29, David Turner wrote:
Your weights should more closely represent the size of the OSDs. OSD3 and OSD6 are weighted properly, but your other 3 OSDs have the same weight even though OSD0 is twice the size of OSD2 and OSD4.
Your OSD weights is what I thought you were referring to when you said you set the crush map to 1. At some point it does look like you set all of your OSD weights to 1, which would apply to OSD1. If the OSD was too small for that much data, it would have filled up and be too full to start. Can you mount that disk and see how much free space is on it?
Just so you understand what that weight is, it is how much data the cluster is going to put on it. The default is for the weight to be the size of the OSD in TiB (1024 based instead of TB which is 1000). If you set the weight of a 1TB disk and a 4TB disk both to 1, then the cluster will try and give them the same amount of data. If you set the 4TB disk to a weight of 4, then the cluster will try to give it 4x more data than the 1TB drive (usually what you want).
In your case, your 926G OSD0 has a weight of 1 and your 460G OSD2 has a weight of 1 so the cluster thinks they should each receive the same amount of data (which it did, they each have ~275GB of data). OSD3 has a weight of 1.36380 (its size in TiB) and OSD6 has a weight of 0.90919 and they have basically the same %used space (17%) as opposed to the same amount of data because the weight is based on their size.
As long as you had enough replicas of your data in the cluster for it to recover from you removing OSD1 such that your cluster is health_ok without any missing objects, then there is nothing that you need off of OSD1 and ceph recovered from the lost disk successfully.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:39 PM Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado <gaguilar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
I was on a old version of ceph. And it showed a warning saying:
crush map has straw_calc_version=0
I rode that adjusting it will only rebalance all so admin should select when to do it. So I went straigth and ran:
ceph osd crush tunables optimal
It rebalanced as it said but then I started to have lots of pg wrong. I discovered that it was because my OSD1. I thought it was disk faillure so I added a new OSD6 and system started to rebalance. Anyway OSD was not starting.I thought to wipe it all. But I preferred to leave disk as it was, and journal intact, in case I can recover and get data from it. (See mail: Scrub failing all the time, new inconsistencies keep appearing).
So here's the information. But it has OSD1 replaced by OSD3, sorry.
ID WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE USE AVAIL %USE VAR PGS
As I said I still have OSD1 intact so I can do whatever you need except readding to the cluster. Since I don't know what It will do, maybe cause havok.
0 1.00000 1.00000 926G 271G 654G 29.34 1.10 369
2 1.00000 1.00000 460G 284G 176G 61.67 2.32 395
4 1.00000 1.00000 465G 151G 313G 32.64 1.23 214
3 1.36380 1.00000 1396G 239G 1157G 17.13 0.64 340
6 0.90919 1.00000 931G 164G 766G 17.70 0.67 210
TOTAL 4179G 1111G 3067G 26.60
MIN/MAX VAR: 0.64/2.32 STDDEV: 16.99
Best regards,
On 14/09/17 17:12, David Turner wrote:
What do you mean by "updated crush map to 1"? Can you please provide a copy of your crush map and `ceph osd df`?
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:39 AM Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado <gaguilar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________Hi,
I'recently updated crush map to 1 and did all relocation of the pgs. At the end I found that one of the OSD is not starting.
This is what it shows:
2017-09-13 10:37:34.287248 7f49cbe12700 -1 *** Caught signal (Aborted) **
in thread 7f49cbe12700 thread_name:filestore_sync
ceph version 10.2.7 (50e863e0f4bc8f4b9e31156de690d765af245185)
1: (()+0x9616ee) [0xa93c6ef6ee]
2: (()+0x11390) [0x7f49d9937390]
3: (gsignal()+0x38) [0x7f49d78d3428]
4: (abort()+0x16a) [0x7f49d78d502a]
5: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char const*)+0x26b) [0xa93c7ef43b]
6: (FileStore::sync_entry()+0x2bbb) [0xa93c47fcbb]
7: (FileStore::SyncThread::entry()+0xd) [0xa93c4adcdd]
8: (()+0x76ba) [0x7f49d992d6ba]
9: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f49d79a53dd]
NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to interpret this.
--- begin dump of recent events ---
-3> 2017-09-13 10:37:34.253808 7f49dac6e8c0 5 osd.1 pg_epoch: 6293 pg[10.8c( v 6220'575937 (4942'572901,6220'575937] local-les=6235 n=282 ec=419 les/c/f 6235/6235/0 6293/6293/6290) [1,2]/[2] r=-1 lpr=0 pi=6234-6292/24 crt=6220'575937 lcod 0'0 inactive NOTIFY NIBBLEWISE] exit Initial 0.029683 0 0.000000
-2> 2017-09-13 10:37:34.253848 7f49dac6e8c0 5 osd.1 pg_epoch: 6293 pg[10.8c( v 6220'575937 (4942'572901,6220'575937] local-les=6235 n=282 ec=419 les/c/f 6235/6235/0 6293/6293/6290) [1,2]/[2] r=-1 lpr=0 pi=6234-6292/24 crt=6220'575937 lcod 0'0 inactive NOTIFY NIBBLEWISE] enter Reset
-1> 2017-09-13 10:37:34.255018 7f49dac6e8c0 5 osd.1 pg_epoch: 6293 pg[10.90(unlocked)] enter Initial
0> 2017-09-13 10:37:34.287248 7f49cbe12700 -1 *** Caught signal (Aborted) **
in thread 7f49cbe12700 thread_name:filestore_sync
ceph version 10.2.7 (50e863e0f4bc8f4b9e31156de690d765af245185)
1: (()+0x9616ee) [0xa93c6ef6ee]
2: (()+0x11390) [0x7f49d9937390]
3: (gsignal()+0x38) [0x7f49d78d3428]
4: (abort()+0x16a) [0x7f49d78d502a]
5: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char const*)+0x26b) [0xa93c7ef43b]
6: (FileStore::sync_entry()+0x2bbb) [0xa93c47fcbb]
7: (FileStore::SyncThread::entry()+0xd) [0xa93c4adcdd]
8: (()+0x76ba) [0x7f49d992d6ba]
9: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f49d79a53dd]
NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to interpret this.
--- logging levels ---
0/ 5 none
0/ 1 lockdep
0/ 1 context
1/ 1 crush
1/ 5 mds
1/ 5 mds_balancer
1/ 5 mds_locker
1/ 5 mds_log
1/ 5 mds_log_expire
1/ 5 mds_migrator
0/ 1 buffer
0/ 1 timer
0/ 1 filer
0/ 1 striper
0/ 1 objecter
0/ 5 rados
0/ 5 rbd
0/ 5 rbd_mirror
0/ 5 rbd_replay
0/ 5 journaler
0/ 5 objectcacher
0/ 5 client
0/ 5 osd
0/ 5 optracker
0/ 5 objclass
1/ 3 filestore
1/ 3 journal
0/ 5 ms
1/ 5 mon
0/10 monc
1/ 5 paxos
0/ 5 tp
1/ 5 auth
1/ 5 crypto
1/ 1 finisher
1/ 5 heartbeatmap
1/ 5 perfcounter
1/ 5 rgw
1/10 civetweb
1/ 5 javaclient
1/ 5 asok
1/ 1 throttle
0/ 0 refs
1/ 5 xio
1/ 5 compressor
1/ 5 newstore
1/ 5 bluestore
1/ 5 bluefs
1/ 3 bdev
1/ 5 kstore
4/ 5 rocksdb
4/ 5 leveldb
1/ 5 kinetic
1/ 5 fuse
-2/-2 (syslog threshold)
-1/-1 (stderr threshold)
max_recent 10000
max_new 1000
log_file /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.1.log
--- end dump of recent events ---
Is there any way to recover it or should I open a bug?
Best regards
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
