Re: Changing the failure domain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



How long are you seeing these blocked requests for?  Initially or perpetually?  Changing the failure domain causes all PGs to peer at the same time.  This would be the cause if it happens really quickly.  There is no way to avoid all of them peering while making a change like this.  After that, It could easily be caused because a fair majority of your data is probably set to move around.  I would check what might be causing the blocked requests during this time.  See if there is an OSD that might be dying (large backfills have the tendancy to find a couple failing drives) which could easily cause things to block.  Also checking if your disks or journals are maxed out with iostat could shine some light on any mitigating factor.  

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:01 AM Laszlo Budai <laszlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear all!

In our Hammer cluster we are planning to switch our failure domain from host to chassis. We have performed some simulations, and regardless of the settings we have used some slow requests have appeared all the time.

we had the the following settings:

  "osd_max_backfills": "1",
     "osd_backfill_full_ratio": "0.85",
     "osd_backfill_retry_interval": "10",
     "osd_backfill_scan_min": "1",
     "osd_backfill_scan_max": "4",
     "osd_kill_backfill_at": "0",
     "osd_debug_skip_full_check_in_backfill_reservation": "false",
     "osd_debug_reject_backfill_probability": "0",

    "osd_min_recovery_priority": "0",
     "osd_allow_recovery_below_min_size": "true",
     "osd_recovery_threads": "1",
     "osd_recovery_thread_timeout": "60",
     "osd_recovery_thread_suicide_timeout": "300",
     "osd_recovery_delay_start": "0",
     "osd_recovery_max_active": "1",
     "osd_recovery_max_single_start": "1",
     "osd_recovery_max_chunk": "8388608",
     "osd_recovery_forget_lost_objects": "false",
     "osd_recovery_op_priority": "1",
     "osd_recovery_op_warn_multiple": "16",


we have also tested it with the CFQ IO scheduler on the OSDs and the following params:
     "osd_disk_thread_ioprio_priority": "7"
     "osd_disk_thread_ioprio_class": "idle"

and the nodeep-scrub set.

Is there anything else to try? Is there a good way to switch from one kind of failure domain to an other without slow requests?

Thank you in advance for any suggestions.

Kind regards,
Laszlo


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux