Re: luminous/bluetsore osd memory requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Ronny Aasen
> Sent: 14 August 2017 18:55
> To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  luminous/bluetsore osd memory requirements
> 
> On 10.08.2017 17:30, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> > This has been discussed a lot in the performance meetings so I've
> > added Mark to discuss. My naive recollection is that the per-terabyte
> > recommendation will be more realistic  than it was in the past (an
> > effective increase in memory needs), but also that it will be under
> > much better control than previously.
> 
> 
> Is there any way to tune or reduce the memory footprint? perhaps by
> sacrificing performace ? our jewel cluster osd servers is maxed out on
> memory. And with the added memory requirements I  fear we may not be
> able to upgrade to luminous/bluestore..

Check out this PR, it shows the settings to set memory used for cache and
their defaults

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/16157


> 
> kind regards
> Ronny Aasen
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux