On 10.08.2017 17:30, Gregory Farnum wrote:
This has been discussed a lot in the performance meetings so I've added Mark to discuss. My naive recollection is that the per-terabyte recommendation will be more realistic than it was in the past (an effective increase in memory needs), but also that it will be under much better control than previously.
Is there any way to tune or reduce the memory footprint? perhaps by sacrificing performace ? our jewel cluster osd servers is maxed out on memory. And with the added memory requirements I fear we may not be able to upgrade to luminous/bluestore..
kind regards Ronny Aasen _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
