Specifying a cache tier for erasure-coding?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Currently, our ceph cluster is all 3-way replicated, and works very
nicely. We're consider the possibility of adding an erasure-coding pool;
which I understand would require a cache tier in front of it to ensure
decent performance.

I am wondering what sort of spec should we be thinking about for the
cache tier, and how robust erasure-coding pools are compared with the
simpler replicated pools?

Our test cluster has 3 storage nodes, each with 60 x 6TB RRD, with NVME
for journals. So for cache tier, we should presumably be thinking SSD?
Roughly how much, and should we consider NVME, or is it not worth the $$$$?

Thanks :)

Matthew


-- 
 The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research 
 Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a 
 company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered 
 office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. 
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux