Gregiory Farnum wrote: > > > You've probably noticed the RGW will create pools if it needs them and > they don't exist. That's why it "needs" the extra monitor capabilities. Yes, I have noticed that - and yes, automatically creating the pools helpeda lot in a lab environment to setup my first gateway. However, in a production environment, I expect that at least the .rgw.buckets.data pool will need more placement groups and/or may reside in an EC pool, etc. - so I expect the pools to be created manually in advance. > The OSD capabilities are because 1) I don't think you could make them > as fine-grained when that documentation was written, 2) laziness about > specifying pools. :) OK. I was just wondering if there are any reasons to allow the gateway more or less global access - i.e. reasons which I did not understand. Of course, laziness is a very good reason :-) Thank you for your comments. best regards -- Diedrich Ehlerding, Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH, MIS ITST CE PS&IS WST, Hildesheimer Str 25, D-30880 Laatzen Fon +49 511 8489-1806, Fax -251806, Mobil +49 173 2464758 Firmenangaben: http://de.ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |