Re: Ceph Performance

[Fuxion Cloud <fuxioncloud@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Our ceph version is 0.80.7. We used it with the openstack as a block storage RBD. The ceph storage configured with 3 replication of data. I'm getting low IOPS (400)  from fio benchmark in random readwrite. Please advise how to improve it. Thanks.

Here's the hardware info.

12 x storage nodes

- 2 x cpus (12 cores)

- 64 GB RAM

- 10 x 4TB SAS 7.2krpm OSD

- 2 x 200GB SSD Journal

- 2 x 200GB SSD OS

- 2 x 10Gb (bond - ceph network)  

- 2 x 10Gb (bond - openstack network)

Ceph status:

 

     health HEALTH_OK

     monmap e1: 3 mons at {node1=10.10.10.11:6789/0,node2=10.10.10.12:6789/0,node7=10.10.10.17:6789/0}, election epoch 1030, quorum 0,1,2 node1,node2,node7

     osdmap e116285: 120 osds: 120 up, 120 in

      pgmap v70119491: 14384 pgs, 5 pools, 5384 GB data, 841 kobjects

            16774 GB used, 397 TB / 413 TB avail

               14384 active+clean

  client io 11456 kB/s rd, 13389 kB/s wr, 420 op/s

Ceph osd tree:

# id weight type name up/down reweight

-1 414 root default

-14 207 rack rack1

-3 34.5 host node1

1 3.45 osd.1 up 1

4 3.45 osd.4 up 1

7 3.45 osd.7 up 1

10 3.45 osd.10 up 1

13 3.45 osd.13 up 1

16 3.45 osd.16 up 1

19 3.45 osd.19 up 1

22 3.45 osd.22 up 1

25 3.45 osd.25 up 1

28 3.45 osd.28 up 1

-4 34.5 host node2

5 3.45 osd.5 up 1

11 3.45 osd.11 up 1

14 3.45 osd.14 up 1

17 3.45 osd.17 up 1

20 3.45 osd.20 up 1

23 3.45 osd.23 up 1

26 3.45 osd.26 up 1

29 3.45 osd.29 up 1

38 3.45 osd.38 up 1

2 3.45 osd.2 up 1

-5 34.5 host node3

31 3.45 osd.31 up 1

48 3.45 osd.48 up 1

57 3.45 osd.57 up 1

66 3.45 osd.66 up 1

75 3.45 osd.75 up 1

84 3.45 osd.84 up 1

93 3.45 osd.93 up 1

102 3.45 osd.102 up 1

111 3.45 osd.111 up 1

39 3.45 osd.39 up 1

-7 34.5 host node4

35 3.45 osd.35 up 1

46 3.45 osd.46 up 1

55 3.45 osd.55 up 1

64 3.45 osd.64 up 1

72 3.45 osd.72 up 1

81 3.45 osd.81 up 1

90 3.45 osd.90 up 1

98 3.45 osd.98 up 1

107 3.45 osd.107 up 1

116 3.45 osd.116 up 1

-10 34.5 host node5

43 3.45 osd.43 up 1

54 3.45 osd.54 up 1

60 3.45 osd.60 up 1

67 3.45 osd.67 up 1

78 3.45 osd.78 up 1

87 3.45 osd.87 up 1

96 3.45 osd.96 up 1

104 3.45 osd.104 up 1

113 3.45 osd.113 up 1

8 3.45 osd.8 up 1

-13 34.5 host node6

32 3.45 osd.32 up 1

47 3.45 osd.47 up 1

56 3.45 osd.56 up 1

65 3.45 osd.65 up 1

74 3.45 osd.74 up 1

83 3.45 osd.83 up 1

92 3.45 osd.92 up 1

110 3.45 osd.110 up 1

119 3.45 osd.119 up 1

101 3.45 osd.101 up 1

-15 207 rack rack2

-2 34.5 host node7

0 3.45 osd.0 up 1

3 3.45 osd.3 up 1

6 3.45 osd.6 up 1

9 3.45 osd.9 up 1

12 3.45 osd.12 up 1

15 3.45 osd.15 up 1

18 3.45 osd.18 up 1

21 3.45 osd.21 up 1

24 3.45 osd.24 up 1

27 3.45 osd.27 up 1

-6 34.5 host node8

30 3.45 osd.30 up 1

40 3.45 osd.40 up 1

49 3.45 osd.49 up 1

58 3.45 osd.58 up 1

68 3.45 osd.68 up 1

77 3.45 osd.77 up 1

86 3.45 osd.86 up 1

95 3.45 osd.95 up 1

105 3.45 osd.105 up 1

114 3.45 osd.114 up 1

-8 34.5 host node9

33 3.45 osd.33 up 1

45 3.45 osd.45 up 1

52 3.45 osd.52 up 1

59 3.45 osd.59 up 1

73 3.45 osd.73 up 1

82 3.45 osd.82 up 1

91 3.45 osd.91 up 1

100 3.45 osd.100 up 1

108 3.45 osd.108 up 1

117 3.45 osd.117 up 1

-9 34.5 host node10

36 3.45 osd.36 up 1

42 3.45 osd.42 up 1

51 3.45 osd.51 up 1

61 3.45 osd.61 up 1

69 3.45 osd.69 up 1

76 3.45 osd.76 up 1

85 3.45 osd.85 up 1

94 3.45 osd.94 up 1

103 3.45 osd.103 up 1

112 3.45 osd.112 up 1

-11 34.5 host node11

50 3.45 osd.50 up 1

63 3.45 osd.63 up 1

71 3.45 osd.71 up 1

79 3.45 osd.79 up 1

89 3.45 osd.89 up 1

106 3.45 osd.106 up 1

115 3.45 osd.115 up 1

34 3.45 osd.34 up 1

120 3.45 osd.120 up 1

121 3.45 osd.121 up 1

-12 34.5 host node12

37 3.45 osd.37 up 1

44 3.45 osd.44 up 1

53 3.45 osd.53 up 1

62 3.45 osd.62 up 1

70 3.45 osd.70 up 1

80 3.45 osd.80 up 1

88 3.45 osd.88 up 1

99 3.45 osd.99 up 1

109 3.45 osd.109 up 1

118 3.45 osd.118 up 1

Thanks,

James

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Christian Wuerdig <christian.wuerdig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Fuxion Cloud <fuxioncloud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all, 

Im newbie in ceph technology. We have ceph deployed by vendor 2 years ago with Ubuntu 14.04LTS without fine tuned the performance. I noticed that the performance of storage is very slow. Can someone please help to advise how to  improve the performance? 

You really need to provide a bit more information than that. Like what hardware is involved (CPU, RAM, how many nodes, how many OSDs, what kind of disks, what size disks, networking hardware), how you use ceph (RBD, RGW, CephFS, plain RADOS object storage).

Outputs of

ceph status

ceph osd tree

ceph df

also provide useful information.

Also what does "slow performance" mean - how have you determined that (throughout, latency)?

 

Any changes or configuration require for OS kernel? 

Regards, 

James

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com