Re: Sharing SSD journals and SSD drive choice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02-05-17 19:54, David Turner wrote:
> Are you guys talking about 5Mbytes/sec to each journal device?  Even if
> you had 8 OSDs per journal and had 2000 osds... you would need a
> sustained 1.25 Gbytes/sec to average 5Mbytes/sec per journal device.

I'm not sure I'm following this...
But I'm rather curious.
Are you saying that the required journal bandwidth versus OSD write
bandwidth has an approx 1:200 ratio??

Note that I took it the other way.
Given the Intel specs
 - What sustained bandwidth is allowed to have the device last its lifetime.
 - How much more usage would a 3710 give in regards to a 3520 SSD per
   dollar spent.

--WjW

> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:47 PM Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     On 02-05-17 19:16, Дробышевский, Владимир wrote:
>     > Willem,
>     >
>     >   please note that you use 1.6TB Intel S3520 endurance rating in your
>     > calculations but then compare prices with 480GB model, which has only
>     > 945TBW or 1.1DWPD (
>     >
>     https://ark.intel.com/products/93026/Intel-SSD-DC-S3520-Series-480GB-2_5in-SATA-6Gbs-3D1-MLC
>     > ). It also worth to notice that S3710 has tremendously higher write
>     > speed\IOPS and especially SYNC writes. Haven't seen S3520 real sync
>     > write tests yet but don't think they differ much from S3510 ones.
> 
>     Arrgh, you are right. I guess I had too many pages open, and copied the
>     wrong one.
> 
>     But the good news is that the stats were already in favour of the 3710
>     so this only increases that conclusion.
> 
>     The bad news is that the sustained write speed goes down with a
>     factor 4.
>     So that is 5Mbyte/sec. Which is real easy to obtain, even with hardware
>     0f 2000.
> 
>     --WjW
> 
> 
>     > Best regards,
>     > Vladimir
>     >
>     > 2017-05-02 21:05 GMT+05:00 Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     > <mailto:wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>:
>     >
>     >     On 27-4-2017 20:46, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
>     >     > Hi,
>     >     >
>     >     >>> What I'm trying to get from the list is /why/ the
>     "enterprise" drives
>     >     >>> are important. Performance? Reliability? Something else?
>     >     >
>     >     > performance, for sure (for SYNC write,
>     https://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/
>     >   
>      <https://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/>)
>     >     >
>     >     > Reliabity : yes, enteprise drive have supercapacitor in case
>     of powerfailure, and endurance (1 DWPD for 3520, 3 DWPD for 3610)
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >>> Also, 4 x Intel DC S3520 costs as much as 1 x Intel DC
>     S3610. Obviously
>     >     >>> the single drive leaves more bays free for OSD disks, but
>     is there any
>     >     >>> other reason a single S3610 is preferable to 4 S3520s?
>     Wouldn't 4xS3520s
>     >     >>> mean:
>     >     >
>     >     > where do you see this price difference ?
>     >     >
>     >     > for me , S3520 are around 25-30% cheaper than S3610
>     >
>     >     I just checked for the DCS3520 on
>     >   
>      https://ark.intel.com/nl/products/93005/Intel-SSD-DC-S3520-Series-1_6TB-2_5in-SATA-6Gbs-3D1-MLC
>     >   
>      <https://ark.intel.com/nl/products/93005/Intel-SSD-DC-S3520-Series-1_6TB-2_5in-SATA-6Gbs-3D1-MLC>
>     >
>     >     And is has a TBW of 2925 (Terrabytes Write over life time) =
>     2,9 PB
>     >     the warranty is 5 years.
>     >
>     >     Now if I do the math:
>     >       2925 * 104 /5 /365 /24 /60 = 1,14 Gbyte/min to be written.
>     >       which is approx 20Mbyte /sec
>     >       or approx 10Gbit/min = 0,15 Gbit/sec
>     >
>     >     And that is only 20% of the capacity of that SATA link.
>     >     Also writing 20Mbyte/sec sustained is not really that hard for
>     modern
>     >     systems.
>     >
>     >     Now a 400Gb 3710 takes 8.3 PB, which is ruffly 3 times as much.
>     >     so it will last 3 times longer.
>     >
>     >     Checking Amazone, I get
>     >             $520 for the DC S3710-400G
>     >             $300 for the DC S3520-480G
>     >
>     >     So that is less than a factor of 2 for using the S3710's and a
>     3 times
>     >     longer lifetime. To be exact (8.3/520) / (2,9/300) = 1.65 more
>     bang for
>     >     your buck.
>     >
>     >     But still do not expect your SSDs to last very long if the
>     write rate is
>     >     much over that 20Mbyte/sec
>     >
>     >     --WjW
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     ceph-users mailing list
>     >     ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>     >     http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>     >     <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     >
>     > С уважением,
>     > Дробышевский Владимир
>     > Компания "АйТи Город"
>     > +7 343 2222192 <tel:+7%20343%20222-21-92>
>     >
>     > ИТ-консалтинг
>     > Поставка проектов "под ключ"
>     > Аутсорсинг ИТ-услуг
>     > Аутсорсинг ИТ-инфраструктуры
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     ceph-users mailing list
>     ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux