Sharing SSD journals and SSD drive choice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Does anyone know if XFS uses a single thread to write to it's journal?

I'm evaluating SSDs to buy as journal devices. I plan to have multiple
OSDs share a single SSD for journal. I'm benchmarking several brands as
described here:

https://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/

It appears that sequential write speed using multiple threads varies
widely between brands. Here's what I have so far:
         SanDisk SDSSDA240G, dd:            6.8 MB/s
         SanDisk SDSSDA240G, fio  1 jobs:   6.7 MB/s
         SanDisk SDSSDA240G, fio  2 jobs:   7.4 MB/s
         SanDisk SDSSDA240G, fio  4 jobs:   7.5 MB/s
         SanDisk SDSSDA240G, fio  8 jobs:   7.5 MB/s
         SanDisk SDSSDA240G, fio 16 jobs:   7.5 MB/s
         SanDisk SDSSDA240G, fio 32 jobs:   7.6 MB/s
         SanDisk SDSSDA240G, fio 64 jobs:   7.6 MB/s
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 30000P10, dd:            1.8 MB/s
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 30000P10, fio  1 jobs:   4.8 MB/s
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 30000P10, fio  2 jobs:   5.2 MB/s
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 30000P10, fio  4 jobs:   9.5 MB/s
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 30000P10, fio  8 jobs:  23.4 MB/s
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 30000P10, fio 16 jobs:   7.2 MB/s
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 30000P10, fio 32 jobs:  49.8 MB/s
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 30000P10, fio 64 jobs:  70.5 MB/s
        INTEL SSDSC2BB150G7, dd:           90.1 MB/s
        INTEL SSDSC2BB150G7, fio  1 jobs:  91.0 MB/s
        INTEL SSDSC2BB150G7, fio  2 jobs: 108.3 MB/s
        INTEL SSDSC2BB150G7, fio  4 jobs: 134.2 MB/s
        INTEL SSDSC2BB150G7, fio  8 jobs: 118.2 MB/s
        INTEL SSDSC2BB150G7, fio 16 jobs:  39.9 MB/s
        INTEL SSDSC2BB150G7, fio 32 jobs:  25.4 MB/s
        INTEL SSDSC2BB150G7, fio 64 jobs:  15.8 MB/s

The SanDisk is slow, but speed is the same at any number of threads. The
Intel peaks at 4-6 threads and then declines rapidly into sub-par
performance (at least for a pricey "enterprise" drive). The SK Hynix is
slow at low numbers of threads but gets huge performance gains with more
threads. (This is all with one trial, but I have a script running
multiple trials across all drives today.)

So if XFS has a single thread that does journaling, it looks like my
best option would be 1 intel SSD shared by 4-6 OSDs. If XFS already
throws multiple threads at the journal, then having OSDs share an Intel
drive will likely kill my SSD performance, but having as many OSDs as I
can cram in a chassis share the SK Hynix drive would get me great
performance for a fraction of the cost.

Anyone have any related advice or experience to share regarding journal
SSD selection?
-- 
Adam Carheden

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux