Félix Barbeira writes: > We are implementing an IPv6 native ceph cluster using SLAAC. We have > some legacy machines that are not capable of using IPv6, only IPv4 due > to some reasons (yeah, I know). I'm wondering what could happen if I > use an additional IPv4 on the radosgw in addition to the IPv6 that is > already running. The rest of the ceph cluster components only have > IPv6, the radosgw would be the only one with IPv4. Do you think that > this would be a good practice or should I stick to only IPv6? That should work fine. We successfully had a similar setup for a long time. (Except we have been using statically- or DHCPv6-statefully-configured IPv6 addresses rather than SLAAC.) If you make RadosGW listen on ::, then it will accept both IPv6 and IPv4 connections. Recently we changed our setup slightly: Now we have multiple RadosGW instances behind a HAproxy front-end - the proxy listens on both IPv6 and IPv4, but will always talk IPv6 to the back-end RadosGW instances. -- Simon. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |