On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:44:53 +0000 John Spray wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Christian Balzer <chibi at gol.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > It's now 10 months after this thread: > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg27497.html (plus next message) > > > > and we're at the fifth iteration of Jewel and still > > > > osd_tier_promote_max_objects_sec > > and > > osd_tier_promote_max_bytes_sec > > > > are neither documented (master or jewel), nor mentioned in the changelogs > > and most importantly STILL default to the broken reverse settings above. > > Is there a pull request? > No there isn't AFAIK, you'd think that an issue that has (had) both Mark's and Sage's attention doesn't require some external lowlife to prod things ahead. A PR suggests somebody (i.e. me) having a solution or fixed documentation handy, which w/o any intimate knowledge of the code may be worse than the current state of affairs. Alas bug reports/tracker items clearly don't work/help: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14153 Christian > John > > > Anybody coming from Hammer or even starting with Jewel and using cache > > tiering will be having a VERY bad experience. > > > > Christian > > -- > > Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer > > chibi at gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications > > http://www.gol.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer chibi at gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications http://www.gol.com/
 |