A Jewel in the rough? (cache tier bugs and documentation omissions)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hello,

It's now 10 months after this thread:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg27497.html (plus next message)

and we're at the fifth iteration of Jewel and still

osd_tier_promote_max_objects_sec
and
osd_tier_promote_max_bytes_sec

are neither documented (master or jewel), nor mentioned in the changelogs
and most importantly STILL default to the broken reverse settings above.

Anybody coming from Hammer or even starting with Jewel and using cache
tiering will be having a VERY bad experience. 

Christian
-- 
Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
chibi at gol.com   	Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications
http://www.gol.com/


[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux