Not really tested,
but searching around, many people say at moment RBD-NBD as more or less
same perforamance.
While RBD-FUSE is really slow.
At the moment I cannot anymore test the kernel version because
downgrading/re-upgrading CRUSH tunable will be a nightmare.
But you can try.
Il 27/02/2017 19:41, Simon Weald ha scritto:
Is there a performance hit when using rbd-nbd?
On 27/02/17 18:34, Massimiliano Cuttini wrote:
But if everybody get Kernel Mismatch (me too)....
... why don't use directly rbd-nbd and forget about kernel-rbd
All feature, almost same performance.
No?
Il 27/02/2017 18:54, Ilya Dryomov ha scritto:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
We already discussed this:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg34559.html
What do you think of comment posted in that ML?
Would that make sense to you as well?
Sorry, I dropped the ball on this. I'll try to polish and push my man
page branch this week.
Thanks,
Ilya
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
