On 12/13/2016 12:42 PM, Francois Lafont wrote: > But, _by_ _principle_, in the specific case of ceph (I know it's not the > usual case of packages which provide daemons), I think it would be more > safe and practical that the ceph packages don't manage the restart of > daemons. And I say (even if I think it was relatively clear in my first post) that *it was the case* before the 10.2.5 version, so I was surprised by this change. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |