is Ceph suitable for small scale deployments?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

I have a question regarding if Ceph is suitable for small scale
deployments.

Lets say I have two machines, connected with gbit lan.

I want to share data between them, like an ordinary NFS
share, but with Ceph instead.

My idea is that with Ceph I would have redundancy with two machines
having complete copies of the data. I also imagine that the
performance could be quite okay in principle, depending on how Ceph
works, which I'm not quite sure of.

A use case would be to share my home directory on two machines, or
three maybe.

A workload I'm concerned with is software builds. Would Ceph be
competetive in this use-case as compared with a local disk? As far as
I can tell Ceph doesn't use the "eventual consistency" approach. Does
that mean that all writes have to sync over all the nodes in the Ceph
cluster, before the write can be considered complete? Or is one node
enough?

/Joakim

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux