Any more data needed? On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:29 AM, bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx <bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Here it is after running overnight (~9h): http://ix.io/1DNi > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:00 PM, bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx > <bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Ah, I was actually mistaken. After running without Valgrind, it seems >> I just estimated how slowed down it was. I'll leave it to run >> overnight as suggested. >> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:44 PM, bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx >> <bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Okay, I left it for 3h and it seemed to actually stabilise at around >>> 2.3G: http://ix.io/1DEK >>> >>> This was only after disabling other services on the system however. >>> Generally this much RAM isn't available to Ceph (hence the OOM >>> previously). >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mark Nelson <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> It should be running much slower through valgrind so probably won't >>>> accumulate very quickly. That was the problem with the earlier trace, there >>>> wasn't enough memory used yet to really get us out of the weeds. If it's >>>> still accumulating quickly, try to wait until the OSD is up to 4+GB RSS if >>>> you can. I usually kill the valgrind/osd process with SIGTERM to make sure >>>> the output is preserved. Not sure what will happen with OOM killer as I >>>> haven't let it get that far before killing. >>>> >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> On 11/08/2016 10:37 AM, bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately I don't think overnight is possible. The OOM will kill it >>>>> in hours, if not minutes. Will the output be preserved/usable if the >>>>> process is uncleanly terminated? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 8 Nov 2016 08:33, "Mark Nelson" <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Heya, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry got distracted with other stuff yesterday. Any chance you >>>>> could run this for longer? It's tough to tell what's going on from >>>>> this run unfortunately. Maybe overnight if possible. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Mark >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11/08/2016 01:10 AM, bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Just bumping this and CCing directly since I foolishly broke the >>>>> threading on my reply. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4 Nov. 2016 8:40 pm, "bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> <mailto:bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx>>" >>>>> <bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> <mailto:bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bobobo1618@xxxxxxxxx>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Then you can view the output data with ms_print or with >>>>> massif-visualizer. This may help narrow down where in the >>>>> code we >>>>> are using the memory. >>>>> >>>>> Done! I've dumped the output from ms_print here: >>>>> http://ix.io/1CrS >>>>> >>>>> It seems most of the memory comes from here: >>>>> >>>>> 92.78% (998,248,799B) (heap allocation functions) >>>>> malloc/new/new[], >>>>> --alloc-fns, etc. >>>>> ->46.63% (501,656,678B) 0xD38936: >>>>> ceph::buffer::create_aligned(unsigned int, unsigned int) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | ->45.07% (484,867,174B) 0xDAFED9: >>>>> AsyncConnection::process() (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->45.07% (484,867,174B) 0xC410EB: >>>>> EventCenter::process_events(int) >>>>> (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->45.07% (484,867,174B) 0xC45210: ??? (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->45.07% (484,867,174B) 0xC6FA31D: >>>>> execute_native_thread_routine (thread.cc:83) >>>>> | | ->45.07% (484,867,174B) 0xBE06452: start_thread (in >>>>> /usr/lib/libpthread-2.24.so <http://libpthread-2.24.so> >>>>> <http://libpthread-2.24.so>) >>>>> | | ->45.07% (484,867,174B) 0xCFCA7DD: clone (in >>>>> /usr/lib/libc-2.24.so <http://libc-2.24.so> >>>>> <http://libc-2.24.so>) >>>>> | | >>>>> | ->01.56% (16,789,504B) in 6 places, all below massif's >>>>> threshold >>>>> (1.00%) >>>>> | >>>>> ->22.70% (244,179,072B) 0x9C9807: BitMapZone::init(long, >>>>> long, bool) >>>>> (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | ->22.70% (244,179,072B) 0x9CACED: >>>>> BitMapAreaLeaf::init(long, long, >>>>> bool) (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | ->22.70% (244,179,072B) 0x9CAE88: >>>>> BitMapAreaLeaf::BitMapAreaLeaf(long, long, bool) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | ->22.67% (243,924,992B) 0x9CAF79: >>>>> BitMapAreaIN::init(long, long, >>>>> bool) (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->12.46% (134,086,656B) 0x9CAFBE: >>>>> BitMapAreaIN::init(long, >>>>> long, bool) (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->12.46% (134,086,656B) 0x9CB237: >>>>> BitAllocator::init_check(long, long, bmap_alloc_mode, bool, >>>>> bool) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->12.46% (134,086,656B) 0x9CB431: >>>>> BitAllocator::BitAllocator(long, long, bmap_alloc_mode, >>>>> bool) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->12.46% (134,086,656B) 0x9C5C32: >>>>> BitMapAllocator::BitMapAllocator(long, long) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->12.46% (134,086,656B) 0x968FF1: >>>>> Allocator::create(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, >>>>> std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, long, long) >>>>> (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->12.46% (134,086,656B) 0x87F65C: >>>>> BlueStore::_open_alloc() (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->12.46% (134,086,656B) 0x8D8CDD: >>>>> BlueStore::mount() (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->12.46% (134,086,656B) 0x4C15EA: >>>>> OSD::init() >>>>> (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->12.46% (134,086,656B) 0x40854C: >>>>> main (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | >>>>> | | ->10.21% (109,838,336B) 0x9CB00B: >>>>> BitMapAreaIN::init(long, >>>>> long, bool) (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->10.21% (109,838,336B) 0x9CB237: >>>>> BitAllocator::init_check(long, long, bmap_alloc_mode, bool, >>>>> bool) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->10.21% (109,838,336B) 0x9CB431: >>>>> BitAllocator::BitAllocator(long, long, bmap_alloc_mode, >>>>> bool) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->10.21% (109,838,336B) 0x9C5C32: >>>>> BitMapAllocator::BitMapAllocator(long, long) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->10.21% (109,838,336B) 0x968FF1: >>>>> Allocator::create(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, >>>>> std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, long, long) >>>>> (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->10.21% (109,838,336B) 0x87F65C: >>>>> BlueStore::_open_alloc() (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->10.21% (109,838,336B) 0x8D8CDD: >>>>> BlueStore::mount() (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->10.21% (109,838,336B) 0x4C15EA: >>>>> OSD::init() >>>>> (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->10.21% (109,838,336B) 0x40854C: >>>>> main (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | >>>>> | ->00.02% (254,080B) in 1+ places, all below ms_print's >>>>> threshold (01.00%) >>>>> | >>>>> ->12.77% (137,350,728B) 0x9CACD8: BitMapAreaLeaf::init(long, >>>>> long, >>>>> bool) (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | ->12.77% (137,350,728B) 0x9CAE88: >>>>> BitMapAreaLeaf::BitMapAreaLeaf(long, long, bool) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | ->12.75% (137,207,808B) 0x9CAF79: >>>>> BitMapAreaIN::init(long, long, >>>>> bool) (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | ->07.01% (75,423,744B) 0x9CAFBE: >>>>> BitMapAreaIN::init(long, long, >>>>> bool) (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->07.01% (75,423,744B) 0x9CB237: >>>>> BitAllocator::init_check(long, long, bmap_alloc_mode, bool, >>>>> bool) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->07.01% (75,423,744B) 0x9CB431: >>>>> BitAllocator::BitAllocator(long, long, bmap_alloc_mode, >>>>> bool) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->07.01% (75,423,744B) 0x9C5C32: >>>>> BitMapAllocator::BitMapAllocator(long, long) (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->07.01% (75,423,744B) 0x968FF1: >>>>> Allocator::create(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, >>>>> std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, long, long) >>>>> (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->07.01% (75,423,744B) 0x87F65C: >>>>> BlueStore::_open_alloc() (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->07.01% (75,423,744B) 0x8D8CDD: >>>>> BlueStore::mount() >>>>> (in /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->07.01% (75,423,744B) 0x4C15EA: >>>>> OSD::init() (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> | | | ->07.01% (75,423,744B) 0x40854C: main >>>>> (in >>>>> /usr/bin/ceph-osd) >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |