Out-of-date RBD client libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What are the potential consequences of using out-of-date client
libraries with RBD against newer clusters?

Specifically, what are the potential ill-effects of using Firefly
client libraries (0.80.7 and 0.80.8) to access Hammer or Jewel
(10.2.3) clusters?

The upgrading instructions (
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/jewel/install/upgrading-ceph/ ) don’t
actually mention clients, just giving the recommended order as:
ceph-deploy, mons, osds, mds, object gateways.

Are long-running RBD clients (like Qemu virtual machines) placed at
risk of instability or data corruption if they are not updated and
restarted before, during, or after such an upgrade?

If so, what are the potential consequences, and where in the process
should they be upgraded to avoid those consequences?

Thanks for any advice!
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux