Hi, if ceph will remote the cache tiering, and not replacing by something similar, it will fall behind other, existing solutions. I dont know what strategy stands behind this decision. But we all cant start advertising and announcing the caching, deviding hot and cold stores to customers all the time, and suddenly telling them, in truth, its not giving any advantage in most cases. If redhat will remove the caching completely, i guess there will be some/many users who will search for other solutions. So i hope, what ever redhat is planning, they will not remove this general feature of separating hot/cold storage in combination with a caching technique. -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards Oliver Dzombic IP-Interactive mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Anschrift: IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt ) Zum Sonnenberg 1-3 63571 Gelnhausen HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht Hanau Geschäftsführung: Oliver Dzombic Steuer Nr.: 35 236 3622 1 UST ID: DE274086107 Am 22.10.2016 um 16:12 schrieb Zoltan Arnold Nagy: > Hi, > > The 2.0 release notes for Red Hat Ceph Storage deprecate cache tiering. > > What does this mean for Jewel and especially going forward? > > Can someone shed some light why cache tiering is not meeting the original expectations technically? > > Thanks, > Zoltan > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |