Re: Does anyone know why cephfs do not support EC pool?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016-10-18T00:06:57, Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises <eperez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is EC in the roadmap for CEPH? Cant seem to find it. My question is because
> "all others" (Nutanix, Hypergrid) do EC storage for VMs as the default way
> of storage. It seems EC in ceph (as of Sept 2016) is considered by many
> "experimental" unless is used for cold data.

Right now (Jewel) you have to "cheat" and put a cache tier in front of
an EC pool if you want to use it for block or direct data access (like
CephFS). That actually works quite well, and you can then also use
much faster storage media in front of your dense EC pool.

The downside is you have to understand how to set some of the cache
tiering tunables and be able to size it appropriately, and understand
the impact of cache tiering on your cluster performance (e.g., the
overhead of the additional traffic between the tiers). Yet, it works
well.

Partial overwrites for EC pools directly is on the roadmap for
Kraken/Luminous, probably leveraging some of BlueStore's new features.
If I understood Sage correctly, he considers that a release criteria for
Luminous.

That'd allow us to directly access EC pools w/o the need for cache
tiering.



Regards,
    Lars

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux