Re: RBD Snapshots and osd_snap_trim_sleep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan van der Ster [mailto:dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 19 September 2016 12:11
> To: Nick Fisk <nick@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  RBD Snapshots and osd_snap_trim_sleep
> 
> Hi Nick,
> 
> I assume you had osd_snap_trim_sleep > 0 when that snapshot was being deleted? I ask because we haven't seen this problem, but
> use osd_snap_trim_sleep = 0.1
> 
> -- Dan


Hi Dan,

I only found that setting post deletion as I was searching to find out if there is a way to throttle it, so it's still set at its default of 0. I will try 0.1 and see if that stops it happening again.

Thanks,
Nick

> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Nick Fisk <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does the osd_snap_trim_sleep throttle effect the deletion of RBD snapshots?
> >
> > I've done some searching but am seeing conflicting results on whether this only effects RADOS pool snapshots.
> >
> > I've just deleted a snapshot which comprised of somewhere around 150k
> > objects and it brought the cluster down to its knees and even caused several OSD's to suicide. Would be nice if I could slow the
> process down somehow.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nick
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux