On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Dennis Kramer (DBS) <dennis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 08/29/2016 08:31 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Francois Lafont >> <francois.lafont.1978@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I had exactly the same error in my production ceph client node with >>> Jewel 10.2.1 in my case. >>> >>> In the client node : >>> - Ubuntu 14.04 >>> - kernel 3.13.0-92-generic >>> - ceph 10.2.1 (3a66dd4f30852819c1bdaa8ec23c795d4ad77269) >>> - cephfs via _ceph-fuse_ >>> >>> In the cluster node : >>> - Ubuntu 14.04 >>> - kernel 3.13.0-92-generic >>> - ceph 10.2.1 (3a66dd4f30852819c1bdaa8ec23c795d4ad77269) >>> >>> It was during the execution of a very basic Python (2.7.6) script which >>> makes some os.makedirs(...) and os.chown(...). >>> >>> Just in case, the logs are below. I'm sorry they are not verbose at all >>> and so probably useless for you... >>> >>> Which settings should I put in my client and cluster configuration to >>> have relevant logs if the same error happens again? >>> >>> Regards. >>> François Lafont >>> >>> Here are the logs: >>> >>> 1. In the client node: http://francois-lafont.ac-versailles.fr/misc/ceph-client.cephfs.log.1.gz >> >> Ha, yep, that's one of the bugs Giancolo found: >> >> ceph version 10.2.1 (3a66dd4f30852819c1bdaa8ec23c795d4ad77269) >> 1: (()+0x299152) [0x7f91398dc152] >> 2: (()+0x10330) [0x7f9138bbb330] >> 3: (Client::get_root_ino()+0x10) [0x7f91397df6c0] >> 4: (CephFuse::Handle::make_fake_ino(inodeno_t, snapid_t)+0x175) >> [0x7f91397dd3d5] >> 5: (()+0x19ac09) [0x7f91397ddc09] >> 6: (()+0x14b45) [0x7f91391f7b45] >> 7: (()+0x1522b) [0x7f91391f822b] >> 8: (()+0x11e49) [0x7f91391f4e49] >> 9: (()+0x8184) [0x7f9138bb3184] >> 10: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f913752237d] >> NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is >> needed to interpret this. >> >> >> So I that'll be in the next Jewel release if it's not already fixed in 10.2.2. >> -Greg > > Hi Greg, > > Any news when the fix is getting backported? This is a serious problem > for our production environment at the moment and we would rather not > want to compile ceph from source if possible. Looks like the locking fix (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10027) didn't have an associated tracker ticket, so got missed for backporting. Opened PR for Jewel backport here: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10921 John > With regards, > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com