Thanks for the help guys. Just an FYI, we had to restart the RGW nodes before the configuration changes were respected, but we were able to change the default placement target, and new buckets were indexless.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Tyler Bischel
<tyler.bischel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can I not update an existing placement target's index_type? I had tried to
> update the default pool's index type:
>
> radosgw-admin zone get --rgw-zone=default > default-zone.json
>
> #replace index_type:0 to index_type:1 in the default zone file, under the
> default-placement entry of the placement_pools
>
> radosgw-admin zone set --rgw-zone=default --infile default-zone.json
>
> However, it seems like I can still access bucket lists of objects after
> additional objects added, which makes me think this setting isn't being
> respected in the way I thought it would.
>
It only affects newly created buckets.
Yehuda
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> In order to use indexless (blind) buckets, you need to create a new
>> placement target, and then set the placement target's index_type param
>> to 1.
>>
>> Yehuda
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Tyler Bischel
>> <tyler.bischel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> > We are looking at using Ceph (Jewel) for a use case that is very write
>> > heavy strictly as an object store. We've been working with Rados
>> > Gateway
>> > because we can easily integrate with existing S3 libraries... but we
>> > will
>> > never be doing any of the bucket listing operations. I am concerned
>> > about
>> > the potential bottleneck of the RGW index files.
>> > I've read here that Jewel now supports "Blind Buckets"... with some
>> > reference to setting a the RGWBucketIndexType to RGWBIType_Indexless...
>> > and
>> > I'm guessing its set as "index_type" here. In the docs, the only
>> > "index_type" reference I see is here, under the placement pools.
>> > However,
>> > the Pools documentation doesn't really give a clue how to set this
>> > value, or
>> > even if this is the proper index_type field that I'm guessing.
>> > So the two things I'm interested in figuring out is:
>> > 1) Are "Blind Buckets" actually production ready
>> > 2) How do I configure Rados Gateway to omit the index files?
>> > --Tyler
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ceph-users mailing list
>> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> >
>
>
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
