For a new cluster, it still missing this udev rules https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/35004a628b2969d8b2f1c02155bb235165a1d809 but it's not a problem on existing cluster, as the old udev rules till exist I think. Anyway, you can copy it manually. I'm running jewel without any problem since 3 week now, on 2 different cluster. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Shain Miley" <smiley@xxxxxxx> À: "Zoltan Arnold Nagy" <zoltan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Juillet 2016 16:32:51 Objet: Re: is it time already to move from hammer to jewel? +1 on looking for some thoughts on this. We are in the same boat and looking for some guidance as well. Thanks, Shain On 07/06/2016 01:47 PM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote: > Hey, > > Those out there who are running production clusters: have you upgraded already to Jewel? > I usually wait until .2 is out (which it is now for Jewel) but just looking for largish deployment experiences in the field before I pull the trigger over the weekend. It’s a largish upgrade going from ~460TB to 1.2PB and at this point I’m just overly cautious. > > One of the main reasons I want to upgrade to is to get the new IO queuing code so the recovery ops won’t hit the VM workloads (that much). (Yes, we have it configured properly, but even one backfill is visible in our client IO…) > Other than that I’m happy with hammer. > > Cheers, > Zoltan > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- NPR | Shain Miley | Manager of Infrastructure, Digital Media | smiley@xxxxxxx | 202.513.3649 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |