Re: rgw pool names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ah that makes sense.  The places where it was not adding the "default"
prefix were all pre-jewel.

-- Tom


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub [mailto:yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 2:36 PM
> To: Deneau, Tom <tom.deneau@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  rgw pool names
> 
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Deneau, Tom <tom.deneau@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > When I start radosgw, I create the pool .rgw.buckets manually to
> > control whether it is replicated or erasure coded and I let the other
> > pools be created automatically.
> >
> > However, I have noticed that sometimes the pools get created with the
> "default"
> > prefix, thus
> > rados lspools
> >   .rgw.root
> >   default.rgw.control
> >   default.rgw.data.root
> >   default.rgw.gc
> >   default.rgw.log
> >   .rgw.buckets                  # the one I created
> >   default.rgw.users.uid
> >   default.rgw.users.keys
> >   default.rgw.meta
> >   default.rgw.buckets.index
> >   default.rgw.buckets.data      # the one actually being used
> >
> > What controls whether these pools have the "default" prefix or not?
> >
> 
> The prefix is the name of the zone ('default' by default). This was added
> for the jewel release, as well as dropping the requirement of having the
> pool names starts with a dot.
> 
> Yehuda
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux