OK, understood... To fix the nearfull warn, I am reducing the weight of a specific OSD, which filled >85%.. Is this work-around advisable? Thanks Swami On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, M Ranga Swami Reddy wrote: >> Hi Sage, >> >Jewel and the latest hammer point release have an improved >> >reweight-by-utilization (ceph osd test-reweight-by-utilization ... to dry >> > run) to correct this. >> >> Thank you....But not planning to upgrade the cluster soon. >> So, in this case - are there any tunable options will help? like >> "crush tunable optimal" or so? >> OR any other configuration options change will help? > > Firefly also has reweight-by-utilization... it's just a bit less friendly > than the newer versions. CRUSH tunables don't generally help here unless > you have lots of OSDs that are down+out. > > Note that firefly is no longer supported. > > sage > > >> >> >> Thanks >> Swami >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, M Ranga Swami Reddy wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have aorund 100 OSDs in my ceph cluster. In this a few OSDs filled >> >> with >85% of data and few OSDs filled with ~60%-70% of data. >> >> >> >> Any reason why the unevenly OSDs filling happned? do I need to any >> >> tweaks on configuration to fix the above? Please advise. >> >> >> >> PS: Ceph version is - 0.80.7 >> > >> > Jewel and the latest hammer point release have an improved >> > reweight-by-utilization (ceph osd test-reweight-by-utilization ... to dry >> > run) to correct this. >> > >> > sage >> > >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |