On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, M Ranga Swami Reddy wrote: > Hi Sage, > >Jewel and the latest hammer point release have an improved > >reweight-by-utilization (ceph osd test-reweight-by-utilization ... to dry > > run) to correct this. > > Thank you....But not planning to upgrade the cluster soon. > So, in this case - are there any tunable options will help? like > "crush tunable optimal" or so? > OR any other configuration options change will help? Firefly also has reweight-by-utilization... it's just a bit less friendly than the newer versions. CRUSH tunables don't generally help here unless you have lots of OSDs that are down+out. Note that firefly is no longer supported. sage > > > Thanks > Swami > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, M Ranga Swami Reddy wrote: > >> Hello, > >> I have aorund 100 OSDs in my ceph cluster. In this a few OSDs filled > >> with >85% of data and few OSDs filled with ~60%-70% of data. > >> > >> Any reason why the unevenly OSDs filling happned? do I need to any > >> tweaks on configuration to fix the above? Please advise. > >> > >> PS: Ceph version is - 0.80.7 > > > > Jewel and the latest hammer point release have an improved > > reweight-by-utilization (ceph osd test-reweight-by-utilization ... to dry > > run) to correct this. > > > > sage > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |