Same physical interfaces (say, LACP) with 2 vlan is my best configuration That way, you can over-use your hardware, and still get per-usage graphs On 04/06/2016 23:41, George Mihaiescu wrote: > One benefit of separate networks is that you can graph the client vs replication traffic. > >> On Jun 4, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Nick Fisk <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Yes, this is fine. I currently use 2 bonded 10G nics which have the untagged vlan as the public network and a tagged vlan as the cluster network. >> >> However, when I build my next cluster I will probably forgo the separate cluster network and just run them over the same IP, as after running the cluster, I don't see any benefit from separate networks when taking into account the extra complexity. Something to consider. >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of >>> Adrian Sevcenco >>> Sent: 04 June 2016 16:11 >>> To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: 2 networks vs 2 NICs >>> >>> Hi! I seen in discussion and in documentation that "networks" is used >>> interchangeable with "NIC" (which also is a different thing than interface) .. >>> So, my question is :for an OSD server with 24 OSDs with a single 40 GB NIC >>> would be ok to have a public network on the main interface and a vlan >>> (virtual) interface for the cluster network? >>> >>> Thank you! >>> Adrian >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |