Re: What's the minimal version of "ceph" client side the current "jewel" release would support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yang,

We've got some proxmox hosts which are still running firefly and appear to be working fine with Jewel. We did have a problem where the firefly clients wouldn't communicate with the ceph cluster due to mismatched capabilities flags but this was resolved by setting "ceph osd crush tunables legacy". Note that moving from optimal tunables to legacy did shuffle quite a bit of data.

Bob

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Yang X <yx888sd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
See title.

We have Firefly on the client side (SLES11SP3) and it does not seem to work well with the "jewel" server nodes (CentOS 7)

Can somebody please provide some guidelines?

Thanks,

Yang


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux