On 05/11/2016 09:19 AM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Mark Nelson <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhaps 0024677 or 3ad19ae introduced another regression that was being
masked by c474e4 and when 66e7464 improved the situation, the other
regression appeared?
0024677 is in Hammer as 7004149 and 3ad19ae is in Hammer as b38da480.
I opened two tickets [1] [2] to investigate further. Can you attach
the fio job you used?
[1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15847
[2] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15848
I can't give you a job file, but I can give you the command line
parameters used in the test:
/home/ubuntu/src/fio/fio --ioengine=rbd --clientname=admin
--pool=cbt-librbdfio --rbdname=cbt-librbdfio-`hostname -f`-0
--invalidate=0 --rw=read --runtime=300 --ramp_time=None --numjobs=1
--direct=1 --bs=131072B --iodepth=32 --end_fsync=0
--write_iops_log=/tmp/cbt/00000000/LibrbdFio/osd_ra-00004096/op_size-00131072/concurrent_procs-008/iodepth-032/read/output.0
--write_bw_log=/tmp/cbt/00000000/LibrbdFio/osd_ra-00004096/op_size-00131072/concurrent_procs-008/iodepth-032/read/output.0
--write_lat_log=/tmp/cbt/00000000/LibrbdFio/osd_ra-00004096/op_size-00131072/concurrent_procs-008/iodepth-032/read/output.0
--log_avg_msec=100 --name=librbdfio-`hostname -f`-0 >
/tmp/cbt/00000000/LibrbdFio/osd_ra-00004096/op_size-00131072/concurrent_procs-008/iodepth-032/read/output.0
Two of these were run concurrently on 4 clients (8 volumes total).
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
