On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Mark Nelson <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Perhaps 0024677 or 3ad19ae introduced another regression that was being > masked by c474e4 and when 66e7464 improved the situation, the other > regression appeared? 0024677 is in Hammer as 7004149 and 3ad19ae is in Hammer as b38da480. I opened two tickets [1] [2] to investigate further. Can you attach the fio job you used? [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15847 [2] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15848 Thanks, -- Jason _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |