Hi, Am 15.04.2016 um 03:07 schrieb Christian Balzer: >> We thought this was a good idea so that we can change the replication >> size different for doc_root and raw-data if we like. Seems this was a >> bad idea for all objects. > I'm not sure how you managed to get into that state or if it's a bug after > all, but I can't replicate it on the latest hammer. > Firstly I created a "default" FS, with the classic metadata and data > pools, mounted it and put some files into the root. > Then I added a second pool (filegoats) and set the layout for a > subdirectory to use it. After re-mounting the FS and copying data to that > subdir I get this, exactly what one would expect: > --- > > NAME ID USED %USED MAX AVAIL OBJECTS > data 0 82043k 0 1181G 334 > metadata 1 2845k 0 1181G 20 > rbd 2 161G 2.84 787G 41914 > filegoats 10 89034k 0 1181G 336 > --- > So no duplicate objects (or at least their headers) for me. > > If nobody else has anything to say about this, I'd consider filing a bug > report. Im must admit that we're currently using 0.87 (Giant) and haven't upgraded so far. Would be nice to know if upgrade would "clean" this state or we should better start with a new cluster ... :( -- Kind regards Michael Metz-Martini _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |