Hi, Am 11.04.2016 um 23:39 schrieb Sage Weil: > ext4 has never been recommended, but we did test it. After Jewel is out, > we would like explicitly recommend *against* ext4 and stop testing it. Hmmm. We're currently migrating away from xfs as we had some strange performance-issues which were resolved / got better by switching to ext4. We think this is related to our high number of objects (4358 Mobjects according to ceph -s). > Recently we discovered an issue with the long object name handling > that is not fixable without rewriting a significant chunk of > FileStores filename handling. (There is a limit in the amount of > xattr data ext4 can store in the inode, which causes problems in > LFNIndex.) We're only using cephfs so we shouldn't be affected by your discovered bug, right? -- Kind regards Michael _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |