> On 13 Apr 2016, at 10:55, Christian Balzer <chibi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:51:08 +0300 Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: > >> 13.04.2016 11:31, Vincenzo Pii wrote: >>> The setup would include five nodes, two monitors and three OSDs, so >>> data would be redundant (we would add the MDS for CephFS, of course). >> >> You need uneven number of mons. In your case I would setup mons on all 5 >> nodes, or at least on 3 of them. >> > What Oleksandr said. > And in your case MONs can be easily co-located with MDS unless they're > hopelessly underpowered. > > See the VERY recent thread "Thoughts on proposed hardware configuration" > for some more thoughts. > > As for CephFS, I think fsck is upcoming in Jewel, but don't quote me on > that, use google and the Ceph Release page. > > Christian > -- > Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer > chibi@xxxxxxx Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications > http://www.gol.com/ Hi Guys, Thanks for the tips, I checked the topic that you mentioned, but at the moment I would really need to understand the implications of using CephFS today (Infernalis) and what can go wrong. Any direct experience with CephFS? Thanks for the help! Vincenzo. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |