Re: cephfs mmap performance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't think there's any point in MMAP-ing a virtual file.
And I'd be surprised if there weren't any bugs or performance issues...

Jan

> On 19 Feb 2016, at 14:38, Dzianis Kahanovich <mahatma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I have content for apache 2.4 in cephfs, trying to be scalable, "EnableMMAP On".
> Some environments known as not friendly for MMAP for SMP scalability (more
> locks). What cephfs-specific recommendations about apache's EnableMMAP setting?
> 
> -- 
> WBR, Dzianis Kahanovich AKA Denis Kaganovich, http://mahatma.bspu.unibel.by/
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux