Re: cephfs, low performances

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 31/12/2015 15:30, Robert LeBlanc wrote:

> Because Ceph is not perfectly distributed there will be more PGs/objects in
> one drive than others. That drive will become a bottleneck for the entire
> cluster. The current IO scheduler poses some challenges in this regard.
> I've implemented a new scheduler which I've seen much better drive
> utilization across the cluster as well as 3-17% performance increase and a
> substantial reduction in client performance deviation (all clients are
> getting the same amount of performance). Hopefully we will be able to get
> that into Jewel.

Ok, thx for the information. So I hope too it will be ready for Jewel.
If I have well understood, Jewel will involve many improvements. I follow
that with attention... ;)

-- 
François Lafont
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux