Re: Ceph journal - isn't it a bit redundant sometimes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 20 Oct 2015, at 11:28, Luis Periquito <periquito@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> One trick I've been using in my ceph clusters is hiding a slow write
>>> backend behind a fast journal device. The write performance will be of
>>> the fast (and small) journal device. This only helps on write, but it
>>> can make a huge difference.
>>> 
>> 
>> Do you mean an external filesystem journal? What filesystem? ext4/xfs?
>> I tried that on a physical machine and it worked wonders with both of them, even though data wasn't journaled and hit the platters - I don't yet understand how that was possible but the benchmark just flew.
>> 
> 
> I just have a raw partition in the journal device (SSD) and point "osd
> journal" to that block device (something like "osd journal =
> /dev/vgsde/journal-8"). So no filesystem in the journal device. Then
> the osd data is in a local HDD using normal XFS filesystem.
> 
> To help this I do have usually big amounts of RAM (average 6G per
> OSD), so the buffered writes to the spindle can take it's time to
> flush.

Oh. I think that's a pretty normal scenario actually.

Jan
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux